This Colson commentary covers some new developments concerning the age of Jerusalem.
I am redating this post because of Paul Tobin's sweeping claim that archaeology, at least since the 1970s, has provided no support for Scripture, and, in particular, his claim that archaeological evidence undermines the Biblical claim that the kingdoms of David and Solomon were substantial.
Popular Posts
-
This piece, by exapologist, is one that I have been meaning to answer for some time, as one of the primary defenders of an anti-naturalistic...
-
Loftus has given me no real indication that he has studied my argument from reason, or has any understanding of the arguments in MY book. An...
-
For the last couple of months, this has been what the main road through the seminary looked like. It has been with uncertainty and a bit of... -
You ever read something and you know you've been nailed--those thoughts, actions, feelings that we don't like to admit to, well...we... -
John: I have never denied that upbringing has any influence. I suppose my upbringing might have provided a set of initial priors. But when ...
-
Thanks to Jan for posting this. Listening at the Cross: The Seven Last Words of Christ on Vimeo
-
Actually, I'm not sure that the Resurrection is the best-evidenced miracle in the New Testament. Of course, it's the most theologic...
-
S. Luke 18. 31 THEN Jesus took unto him the twelve, and said unto them, Behold, we go up to Jerusalem, and all things that are written by th...
-
We are now halfway through Summer Greek. My head has finally stopped spinning around long enough for me to write. Most of us in Greek class ...